Saul Levmore and Catherine M. Sharkey KF A2 F68 Foundation Press Good for: Understanding Concepts Foundations is best used for understanding the underlying ideas that permeate tort law. There are explanations of the overall goals of tort law and the economic driving force that shapes how courts have developed rules. Overall, this book is helpful in understanding the policy reasons behind the rules and standards in tort law.
John L. Diamond, Lawrence C. Levine, and Anita Bernstein KF D5 Understanding Series Good for: Understanding Concepts This one would be most helpful for understanding concepts and outlining. It's arranged in an outline format, which is great for when you are putting your outline together and need a more in-depth understanding of a concept or a synthesized rule. If you are struggling with a subject and need a comprehensive review of it, this book will do the trick.
If you just want to find a broad explanation of rules and explanations for them, this is also a good source. The only downside is that it can be a lengthy read if you need to go over a lot of concepts. Anita Bernstein KF Z9 B47 Questions and Answers Series Good for: Exam Preparation The majority of this study aid is composed of multiple choice questions divided by subject with some short answer questions peppered throughout.
These questions are classified as easy, medium, and hard to give you a variety of difficulty. There's a 90 minute practice exam at the end to help you get in test-taking mode.
Overall, this study aid is a good way for you to practice the application of your knowledge to various hypotheticals when you are getting ready for the exam. Steven L. Emanuel KF The flow charts are helpful for determining the basic prima facie case for torts and would likely be better served in supplementing your outline. The short outline provides a quick review of everything likely to be on an exam.
The short answer questions and essay questions are the most useful part of this book and provide a great last-minute way to test your knowledge of tort law. Marc A. Franklin, W. Jonathan Cardi, and Michael D.
Green KF Z9 F7 Gilbert Law Summaries Good for: Outlining, Exam Preparation Gilbert's is a well-known provider of study aids and is best used for outlining and preparing exam answers. It provides a comprehensive outline of torts with sufficient explanations of the subjects and rules. At the beginning of each subject there us a section on "Key Exam Issues" that tells you what to focus on when studying.
The outline is very helpful in that it lays out the elements of each tort right away and provides several examples for each tort to illustrate the issues and remind you of landmark cases that mirror those issues.
There are also "exam tips" throughout that keep you focused on how to respond to possible exam questions. I also found the charts throughout the book to be quite helpful. While this aid is mainly helpful with outlining, you might also use the multiple choice questions and ten essay questions in your exam preparation at the end of the semester.
Shubha Ghosh KF Z9 G48 Acing Law School Series Good for: Understanding Concepts With its short and sweet overview of tort law concepts and hypotheticals this book makes for a good supplement. It provides straightforward explanations of the law and then tests your knowledge with hypotheticals after every chapter. There are also handy checklists at the end of each chapter to keep you thinking about what to write for an exam answer.Quick links.
A forum for applicants and admitted students to ask law students and graduates about law school and the practice of law. These quizzes don't count for a lot grade wise but I was obviously not happy since a there is mc on the final b I know the material c the three I got wrong all felt like trick questions either there seemed to be no right answer or multiple contending answers. Is there a good way to prepare for these? Just practice? Is it lol that I'm freaking out a little?
The class average is 5. In the interim I outlined the class material up until this point, which was super helpful. Basically, the prof writes the questions in a tricky way a b c d e, where d.
So i'm feeling I have a better hand on this. The ones i got wrong I looked at the explanation to see why i got it wrong. My mistakes were always I rushed to fast and I would give an answer for the wrong type of question.
For example I would say the answer was consent Intentional tort answer when they answer should have been assumed the risk negligence answer.
Once i took my time and asked myself what type of tort is this, is this a duty question or causation question, etc etc i significantly raised my MC score and got 2nd highest grade in the class. Hope this helps. It was pretty crappy. I wouldn't recommend it, but I'm not sure if there's another mainstream MC supplement out there. I'm sure it was mentioned above, but if your prof has past exams on file, those would be the best questions to practice with.
Torts Multiple Choice Questions and Answers for MBE Exam
Who is online Users browsing this forum: ulyssescat5 and 3 guests. Site Search.Hello, I am Theresa Williams After being in relationship with Michael for years, he broke up with me, I did everything possible to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so much because of the love I have for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused.
I explained my problem to my friend and she suggested that I should rather contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back but I am the type that never believed in spell, I had no choice than to try it, I mailed the spell caster, and she told me there was no problem that everything will be okay before three days, that my ex will return to me before three days, he cast the spell and surprisingly in the second day, it was around 4 pm. My ex called me, I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that happened that he wanted me to return to him, that he loves me so much.
I was so happy and went to him that was how we started living together happily again. Since then, I have made promise that anybody I know that have a relationship problem, I would be of help to such person by referring him or her to the only real and powerful spell caster who helped me with my own problem.
Share to Twitter Share to Facebook. Unknown 3 May at Theresa 12 December at Subscribe to: Post Comments Atom. See Also. Possession : Meaning, Definition and Kinds of possession.
According to Salmond, in the whole range of legal theory, there is no conception more difficult than that of Possession. Damnum sine injuria. Injuria sine damno. Doctrine of Res Gestae. Definition of Transfer of Property and essentials For valid Transfer.
Define the term Transfer of propertywhat are the Essentials of a valid Transfer of Property?The accompanying exam answers are written by Bar None Review. Use of these answers is for your personal bar review preparation and law school study only. The exam answers may not be reprinted or republished in any form without express written permission.
Dina, aged sixteen, lives at home with her mother, Mary, in a state where the age of majority is eighteen. Mary is aware that Dina has recently exhibited a sometimes violent and delusionary nature diagnosed as schizophrenia and has attacked persons in the neighborhood. Mary questioned Dina about the incident, scolded her, and asked if Dina was taking her medication.
When Dina said she was, Mary did not pursue the matter. Two days after Dina confronted Paul, Dina saw him raking leaves which had fallen into the street fronting their adjoining homes. Dina got on her bicycle and rode it as rapidly as she could directly at Paul. Although Dina swerved away from Paul at the last moment, Paul reacted by diving to one side.
He struck his head on the curb and suffered a severe concussion and facial injuries. Paul has sued Dina alleging the intentional tort of assault. In order to recover, Paul must establish that Dina 1 intentionally 2 created in Paul a reasonable apprehension 3 of imminent harmful or offensive bodily contact. There are two acts of Dina that might give rise to liability for assault. Reasonable Apprehension. She was face to face with Paul and screaming at him and making threatening gestures.
These actions may alone have created an apprehension in Paul. There is no reasonable apprehension of imminent harm, and thus, this element of the tort of assault is not met. Thus, Dina is not liable to Paul for the verbal threat. The second act of Dina which may give rise to the tort of assault is when Dina rode her bicycle at Paul. Dina of her own volition rode her bike towards Paul as fast as possible. This satisfies the requirements of intent. The answer is no.
All persons are capable of intentional torts. There is no incapacity defense. So long as the act is voluntary and is substantially certain to bring about the intended result, the element of intent is met. Reasonable Apprehension of Imminent Harm. Paul saw Dina riding towards him and was put in fear of harm as evidenced by his leaping to one side to avoid Dina.
STUDY GUIDE FOR LAW 541 TORTS: Study Aids and Tutorials
The test for apprehension is, however, an objective one. In this circumstance, having received a prior verbal threat from Dina and now with her act of bicycling toward him at high speed, Paul had a reasonable apprehension of imminent bodily harm. Dina had the apparent intent to carry out a threat and also the present ability to carry out her threat.
Dina is therefore liable to Paul for assault.Welcome to Regent University Law School. We look forward to serving your research needs. This guide will help you find torts resources offered by your Law Library.
Under the Study Aids and Tutorials tab, you will find resources to help you better understand the different issues encountered in torts. The CALI lessons provide self-paced tutorials and are a great way to gain more insight into this topic.
Please click on the Sample Exam Questions tab for more helpful resources. Please contact the Law Library at lawref regent. You may also reach us at Additional Tutorials. CALI is a valuable resource for law students seeking additional perspective and instruction on specific law school topics. Lectures from law professors across the country are available. Here are some we think may be useful to you. Many more CALI lessons are available. Click on Lessons at the top.
For assistance, please contact Law Reference at lawref regent. University Library Home. Law School Home. Regent University Home. Bill Magee. Contact Information Please contact the Law Library at lawref regent. Long Island RR Co. Audio Torts by Steven R. Finz; Lawrence C. Levine ISBN: Information useful to preparing and pressing your case. Glannon ISBN: Use at the beginning and midway through the semester to deepen your understanding through clear explanations, corresponding hypothetical fact patterns, and analysis.
Then use to study for finals by reviewing the hypotheticals as well as the structure and reasoning behind the accompanying analysis. Each guide helps you learn new material by working through chapters that explain each topic in simple language challenges your understanding with hypotheticals similar to those presented in class provides valuable opportunity to study for the final by reviewing the hypotheticals as well as the structure and reasoning behind the corresponding analysis quickly gets to the point in conversational style laced with humor remains a favorite among law school students is often recommended by professors who encourage the use of study guides works with ALL the major casebooks, suits any class on a given topic provides an alternative perspective to help you understand your casebook and in-class lectures.
A clear, concise, current, and authoritative explanation of all of the most important U. Coverage includes tort law origins and objectives; causation; strict liability; negligence liability and defenses; intentional tort liability and defenses; special liability rules premises liability, products liability, employers, etc.
ISBN: This study aid features an innovative method of content organization. It uses a checklist format to lead students through questions they need to ask to fully evaluate the legal problem they are trying to solve. It also synthesizes the material in a way that most students are unable to do on their own, and assembles the different issues, presenting a clear guide to procedural analysis that students can draw upon when writing their exams. Other study aids provide sample problems, but none offer the systematic approach to problem solving found in this book combined with concise analytical summaries of the leading issues in tort law.X can sue the railway authorities for the loss suffered.
X cannot sue because he had given his consent to travel in over-crowded train. X cannot sue the railway authorities because there was no infringement of legal right and mere fact that the loss was caused does not give to a cause of action.
He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to the negligence to Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car suffered multiple injuries.
She seeks compensation from Brooke bond and Co. Shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.
The queues extended on the highway and also caused some obstruction to the neighbouring shops. The neighbouring shopkeepers brought and action for nuisance against the defendant. PRINCIPLE: Everybody is under a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can take reasonable care to avoid and act or omission which he can foresee would injure his neighbour.
The neighbour, for this purpose, is any person whom he should have in his mind as likely to be affected by his act. The cyclist died on the spot with a lot of blood spilling around, Lakshmi, a pregnant woman passing by, suffered from a nervous shock, leading to abortion. Lakshmi filed a suit against Krishnan claiming damages. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.
Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan, who could not put up with and kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan. FACTS: A purchased a car from a person who had no little to it and had send it to a garage for repair.
X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage. Instead of depositing the money, Y misappropriates it.
Which of the following statements depict correct legal position in this given legal situation? During the match, a ball struck for six hits R on his body and injures him. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses. Subsequently, a new school NS was set up in the same locality which charged lower fees, on account of which people started patronising the new school. Because of the competition, ES had to reduce its fees.Torts - multiple choice. Intellectual Property. Media and Entertainment Law.
Note: Deprecated question sets are available here. Note: My current students should not use this. Torts I long-form essay questions covering negligence and healthcare torts, plus intentional torts as of Torts II long-form essay questions covering strict liability, products liability, privacy, defamation, and business torts, plus intentional torts through Multiple choice questions for the Antitrust course.
Torts Study Aids
Long-format essay exams for Sales. Multiple choice questions for Sales. Multiple choice questions for the IP course. Golden Gate University. University of Dayton. Harvard Law School.
Michael Dorf. If you know of another public, online source of law-school exams, please let me know!
Eric E. Johnson Home Audio Lectures. All content copyright Eric E. All rights reserved. Certain old exam materials previously posted publicly, which I no longer regard as useful for studying, are preserved here. Johnson Professor Eric E. Eric Goldman Prof. Michael Dorf If you know of another public, online source of law-school exams, please let me know!